Monday, 26 September 2011

2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco Drive – Review – Car and Driver

By John Phillips with photography by A.J. Mueller and manufacturer - from Car and Driver
Hard to believe, but what we have, here, is the eighth-generation Malibu, a car spanning 35 years and, uh, six decades. It has historically been a kind of peripatetic approximation of Midwestern mobile civility—here today, gone tomorrow, then suddenly back again—and it was surely facing another passenger-pigeon demise when GM startlingly imbued the Malibu with all of the stellar credentials found in its sister, the Saturn Aura. Faster than we could say, “GM didwhat?” the previous-gen Malibu landed on our 2008 10Best list.
2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco
The first brand-new Malibu, slated to appear in the spring of 2012, is the Eco, featuring GM’s “light electrification of a traditional powertrain,” a.k.a. eAssist. GM doesn’t want us calling it a hybrid, although “hybrid” sure rolls off the tongue easier than “light electrification.” The system includes an all-in-one motor/generator that replaces the alternator, connected to 32 lithium-ion cells jammed into a 65-pound battery pack located aft of the rear seat. Via a rubber belt, the electric motor—built in China, with no permanent magnets—contributes a bonus 15 horses directly to the crankshaft, mostly under wide-open throttle. Fun fact: The belt has a duty life of 75,000 miles. The Eco’s gas engine displaces 2.4 liters and produces 182 horsepower. Combined, engine and motor are expected to deliver 26 mpg in the city and 38 on the highway. We shall see.
Then, next summer, the more traditional gas-only Malibus will arrive—LS, LT, and LTZ—and they’ll all be powered by a brand-new 2.5-liter Ecotec producing an estimated 190 ponies. If so, that’s a healthy 21-hp nudge beyond the Malibu’s existing inline four. By the way, GM is so certain you’re freaked out over fuel prices that no V-6 will be offered. That’s a bold wager.
We didn’t drive a Malibu with the new engine. It wasn’t ready. Nor was GM positive about its power output. Nor of its fuel economy, although “more than 30 mpg highway” was a stated goal. Instead, what we drove was a preproduction Malibu Eco with 17-inch tires and an LTZ-level cabin that wasn’t finished. Price? GM didn’t know that, either. Hey, sometimes you make the trailer for a movie before you make the movie, okay?
The Malibu’s upscale cabin remains upscale, awash in contrasting colors and classy stitching, as well as so-called basketball graining, which sounds awful but contributes to dimension and depth. So, too, do new decorative lateral dashboard “vanes” that glow with ice-blue ambient lighting. The radio’s touch screen cleverly flips up to reveal a six-inch-deep bin that’s big enough to swallow a cell phone and abag of Fritos. The front seat cushions are firm and nicely scalloped. For two folks, back-seat comfort is excellent, with the Malibu’s wider front and rear tracks resulting in a 3.2-inch gain in shoulder room.
On GM’s ride-and-handling track in Milford, Michigan, what we first noticed is that the new Malibu is extraordinarily quiet, that its structure feels even more solid than before, and that you can’t feel the electric motor kicking on or off. The ride is firm but appropriate to the market, and body motions are adequately damped. At light throttle, there’s no telling how many cylinders are at play. At rest, there are supposed to be zero cylinders at play, thanks to the automatic stop-start function, but our test car never turned itself off. Under WOT, the Ecotec still evinces a high-frequency thrum that lays bare its humble four-ishness, and it will be thrumming aplenty because this new Malibu feels heavy, asking for a lot of throttle to get out of the blocks. How heavy? GM doesn’t know that, either. Or at least isn’t telling. The car certainly feels no quicker to 60 mph than the 8.7 seconds required for the Malibu LT we sampled in March 2008. Anyone yet pining for the abandoned V-6’s 252 horses?
The Malibu’s ZF electrically assisted power steering is low on feedback, but the weighting is fine and so is tracking. Here’s good news: The regenerative braking that helps charge the batteries reveals itself not at all in pedal feel. No pulses, no soft spots—just firm, linear travel. Here’s bad news: The battery pack rests between the rear wheel wells and is cooled by a fan in the rear parcel shelf. It draws air from the cockpit. What with all of its tubes and snorkels, the thing reduces trunk space by two cubic feet. What’s more, it emits a jet-like whoosh when the engine is stoked with major throttle. Rear passengers will ask, “Are we taking off now?” At least front passengers can’t hear it. The battery pack also completely blocks the right-rear seat’s pass-through.
Every Malibu is equipped with a Hydra-Matic 6T40 with a manual shift mode, which is operated via a squishy rocker atop the shift knob. It would be a lot more convenient to bang away at the whole shift lever, but maybe Malibu drivers view that as hostile.
GM plans to sell the new Malibu on six continents, assembling it in four factories: two in the U.S., one in China, and one in South Korea. The car certainly looks the part with its bulked-up, I’m-about-to-pop-a-vein muscularity. Yet it boasts a Cd of 0.29, down from the previous Malibu’s 0.35, a huge gain.
Of course, don’t take any of this too seriously. We drove the Malibu Eco maybe 10 miles on the very test track where it was developed. It ought to feel good there, right?
As you read the following sentence, mimic Alec Baldwin’s deepest, darkest, most threatening voice, as if he’s narrating the trailer for an action movie: “In a world gone mad with power, there’s one Malibu, a Malibu that runs deep and won’t have a V-6 and doesn’t know anyone in Malibu. It’s a Malibu that’s ready for action—quiet action—from Muskegon to Miami but mostly in Muskegon. And if it doesn’t advance the chains as far down America’s sidelines as its predecessor, neither does it fumble. It’s your Malibu—America’s Malibu—but also China’s Malibu. Jeepers.”



2013 Chevrolet Malibu Eco Drive – Review – Car and Driver:

Sunday, 25 September 2011

Electronic Stability Control now mandatory | Wheels.ca

With all the hype about 2012 models and auto-show concepts grabbing the headlines, perhaps the most important introduction of the new model year slipped by beneath the radar on Sept. 1.
It wasn’t a new vehicle but a new regulation, Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (CMVSS) 126, requiring that all vehicles for sale in Canada manufactured on or after that date, having a total mass of 4,536 kg (10,000 pounds) or less, must be equipped with Electronic Stability Control (ESC).
Essentially the same standard has been progressively phased in over the past three years in the United States, reaching 100 per cent implementation there at the same time.
It’s an important rule because ESC is among the most effective safety technologies to be mandated since Vehicle Safety Standards were introduced more than 40 years ago.
A literature review on the subject reveals that the adoption of ESC has the potential to reduce fatalities from single-vehicle car crashes by 30 to 50 per cent and those involving SUVs by 50 to 70 per cent. Those aren’t just theoretical projections but statistical probabilities based on real-word experience.
In addition, fatalities due to rollover crashes may be reduced by 70 to 90 per cent, regardless of vehicle type.
Stated in different terms, according to the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), across-the-board adoption of ESC could save up to 9,600 lives annually and prevent up to 238,000 injuries in that country alone. Just what is this magic elixir? It’s nothing magic at all; just modern technology well applied.
As its name implies, it is an electronic control system that helps keep a vehicle going on a stable path in conditions that might otherwise provoke a skid or a spin. In colloquial parlance, it is sometimes referred to as “skid control.”
The term Electronic Stability Control is generic. Individual automakers may identify it by a variety of proprietary names, such as: AdvanceTrac; Dynamic Stability Control (DSC); Electronic Stability Program (ESP); StabiliTrak; Vehicle Stability Assist (VSA); Vehicle Stability Control (VSC); and Vehicle Dynamic Control (VDC).
Technically, it’s a further evolution of the technology introduced in the 1980s for Traction Control and ABS (AntiLock Brake System).
Individually, they sense and act to limit wheelspin or lockup by applying or releasing the brakes at individual wheels and/or reducing engine power output. ESC does the same thing, but typically adds additional sensors to monitor steering input and yaw angle and speed.
If those sensors determine that the vehicle is turning more or less than the steering input is directing it to turn, as in a front-wheel-slide or rear-wheel-skid, ESC either reduces engine power or applies the appropriate individual brake(s), or both, to bring it back on course.
So, for example, if the front end of your vehicle should begin to slide out when negotiating a right-hand turn on a slippery road, ESC would sense that happening — probably before you do — and might apply light pressure to the right rear brake.
Doing so would cause the vehicle to pivot around that wheel, ever so slightly, and that action would tighten its turning circle and bring the vehicle back toward the path in which it’s being steered.
Or, if it is a front-wheel-drive vehicle, ESC might reduce the engine’s power output just a bit, reducing the driving force to the front wheels, thus allowing more of the tires’ traction to be devoted to cornering — again tightening its turning circle and bringing the vehicle back toward its steered path.
In the case of an imminent rear-wheel slide on the same right-hand turn, ESC might choose to lightly apply the brake at the left front wheel, thus helping to straighten the car’s direction, and/ or to reduce engine power in a rear-wheel-drive vehicle.
The choice of actions may vary depending on the combination of circumstances.
Some ESC may be temporarily switched off, which can be advantageous if you’re stuck in mud or snow.
In addition, some high-performance vehicles offer one or more modes with raised thresholds of intervention, to permit more driver involvement for track outings.
But in all other conditions, the statistics verify that it’s best left on.
Gerry Malloy can be e-mailed at mgmalloy@aol.com

Electronic Stability Control now mandatory | Wheels.ca:

Friday, 16 September 2011

Welcome To JPC Auto - home of Your Auto Purchase Adviser, James Phieffer

Hi there, and welcome to the new site.  JPC Auto is designed to be the site for people looking to buy a car.  Here you will find links to new and used car reviews from sites around the world, as well as articles written by myself about cars, light trucks, and even heavy (class 8) trucks.

This site is also home for my business, also known as JPC Auto.  What I do is fairly straightforward - I will help you buy the car YOU want and need.  Not what a dealer wants you to buy.

When you buy a house, you hire a real estate agent to assist you, to help you make the best purchase possible, and to educate you on what to look for in a house, as well as what to avoid.  With the average new car purchase price in Canada hitting $25,683 in 2009 (StatsCan figure from autonorth.ca), with interest you can easily pay out $40,000 dollars or more for a car.

You owe it to yourself, when purchasing a car, to make sure you buy the car that is best for you, the one you will still be happy with when you are making payments three or four years down the road.

So why call me?  I am someone with a long history of studying the auto industry.  I have sold cars before, and understand how dealerships work - and no, they're not simply out to rip you off.  Salespeople are like you or me - looking to earn an honest living.  But their job is to sell you a car from their dealership - not tell you if the car that's best for you might be at another manufacturer's dealer down the road.

I know what's coming next from the car manufacturers.  I know when models are going to be replaced, so you won't be buying last years technology - unless you do so with your eyes open and at an appropriate price.

I don't work for any dealer.  I also don't work on a commission.  I charge a flat rate, so there is no benefit to me for convincing you to buy a more expensive vehicle.

And what is the cost?  $300 $200 Grand Opening Special!  Sorry, couldn't resist the dealer talk...

So I hope you call me (613-661-6112), or e-mail me (jphieffer@gmail.com), and allow me to help you buy your next car.